Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gregory Thayer results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 219 hits . Analysis detected 1,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,117 authors). This Gregory Thayer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Gregory Thayer
Author details
Total words: 2,218
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst