Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These George David Banks results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 627 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,474 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,659 authors). This George David Banks is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
George David Banks
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%George David Banks (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,474
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.4%4.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos