Author summary
9%1 analyzed article/video1,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Apodaca results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 2,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (6,423 of 6,779 authors). This Evan Apodaca is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Evan Apodaca
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Evan Apodaca attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Evan Apodaca vs sitewide
Evan Apodaca attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.