Author summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video1,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esther Bergdahl results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 742 hits. Analysis detected 4,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,365 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (2,526 of 5,781 authors). This Esther Bergdahl is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Esther Bergdahl
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠57%Esther Bergdahl (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,365
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Esther Bergdahl attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Esther Bergdahl vs sitewide
Esther Bergdahl attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos