Author summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Ash results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 297 hits . Analysis detected 1,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,126 of 8,527 authors). This Eric Ash is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Eric Ash
Author details
Total words: 3,360
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst