Author summary
⁠59%3 analyzed articles/videos743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Roth results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 489 hits. Analysis detected 3,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,972 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,145 of 4,973 authors). This Emma Roth is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Emma Roth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠77%Emma Roth (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,972
Article count: 3
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emma Roth attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emma Roth vs sitewide
Emma Roth attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos