Author summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video1,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Margaretten results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 765 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (8,344 of 8,461 authors). This Emily Margaretten is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
Emily Margaretten
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠2%Emily Margaretten (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,884
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emily Margaretten attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emily Margaretten vs sitewide
Emily Margaretten attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos