Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emeline Posner results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 860 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,606 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,145 authors). This Emeline Posner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emeline Posner
Author details
Total words: 3,606
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst