Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 1,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elsa Ohlen results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Recency Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 232 hits . Analysis detected 2,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (4,039 of 9,471 authors). This Elsa Ohlen is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Elsa Ohlen
Author details
Total words: 3,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst