Author summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellen Schmidt results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 787 hits. Analysis detected 2,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (2,356 of 6,437 authors). This Ellen Schmidt is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Ellen Schmidt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠64%Ellen Schmidt (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ellen Schmidt attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ellen Schmidt vs sitewide
Ellen Schmidt attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos