Author summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claudia Lauer results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 787 hits. Analysis detected 2,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (2,378 of 6,515 authors). This Claudia Lauer is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Claudia Lauer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠64%Claudia Lauer (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Claudia Lauer attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Claudia Lauer vs sitewide
Claudia Lauer attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos