Author summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diane Adame results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 834 hits . Analysis detected 4,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,288 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,663 of 9,145 authors). This Diane Adame is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Diane Adame
Author details
Total words: 5,288
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst