Author summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hambling results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 158 hits . Analysis detected 2,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,697 of 9,487 authors). This David Hambling is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. David Hambling
Author details
Total words: 4,872
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst