Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David DeBolt results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This David DeBolt is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
David DeBolt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%David DeBolt (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 384
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles384 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos