Author summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Crookes results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 866 faulty-reasoning hits from 692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (591 of 4,797 authors). This David Crookes is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
David Crookes
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠0%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠1%Jason Karaian1%
⁠88%David Crookes (selected)7%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 692
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Crookes attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Crookes vs All Other Publications
David Crookes attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos