Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dave Decker results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 138 faulty-reasoning hits from 738 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,973 authors). This Dave Decker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dave Decker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Tabitha Mueller1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Dave Decker (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 738
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles738 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Optimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos