Author summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Gaddy results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 1,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (912 of 6,730 authors). This Daniel Gaddy is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Daniel Gaddy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠87%Daniel Gaddy (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,684
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Daniel Gaddy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Daniel Gaddy vs sitewide
Daniel Gaddy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos