Author summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video4,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Byman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 6,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,749 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (4,679 of 4,797 authors). This Daniel Byman is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Daniel Byman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠0%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠1%Jason Karaian1%
⁠3%Daniel Byman (selected)2%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,749
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Daniel Byman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Daniel Byman vs All Other Publications
Daniel Byman attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos