Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dan Milmo results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.3% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,133 authors). This Dan Milmo is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dan Milmo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Dan Milmo (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,720
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos