Author summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Connor Echols results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 2,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (2,483 of 8,317 authors). This Connor Echols is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Connor Echols
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠71%Connor Echols (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,632
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Connor Echols attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Connor Echols vs sitewide
Connor Echols attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos