Author summary
3%1 analyzed article/video1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheryl McCloud results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,613 of 8,771 authors). This Cheryl McCloud is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Cheryl McCloud
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
14%Cheryl McCloud (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,800
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.7%0.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.1%0.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos