Author summary
22%1 analyzed article/video389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charley DiAdamo results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 475 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,648 of 9,010 authors). This Charley DiAdamo is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Charley DiAdamo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
49%Charley DiAdamo (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,556
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos