Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Q. Choi results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (6,488 of 6,799 authors). This Charles Q. Choi is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Charles Q. Choi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠5%Charles Q. Choi (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,172
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Charles Q. Choi attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Charles Q. Choi vs sitewide
Charles Q. Choi attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos