Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chanel Hill results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 127 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,965 authors). This Chanel Hill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chanel Hill
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Tabitha Mueller1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Chanel Hill (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos