Author summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chalkbeat Chicago results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (640 of 9,156 authors). This Chalkbeat Chicago is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Chalkbeat Chicago
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠93%Chalkbeat Chicago (selected)8%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 668
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510093.0% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles668 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos