Author summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candice James results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (1,224 of 6,580 authors). This Candice James is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Candice James
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠82%Candice James (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,200
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Candice James attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Candice James vs sitewide
Candice James attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos