Author summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video1,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cal Chengqi Fang results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 2,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,215 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (3,958 of 5,400 authors). This Cal Chengqi Fang is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Cal Chengqi Fang
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠27%Cal Chengqi Fang (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,215
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cal Chengqi Fang attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cal Chengqi Fang vs sitewide
Cal Chengqi Fang attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos