Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brian Kirkpatrick results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,346 authors). This Brian Kirkpatrick is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Brian Kirkpatrick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Brian Kirkpatrick (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 328
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles328 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Indoctrination: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos