Author summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bence Nanay Ph.D. results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 745 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (4,965 of 8,731 authors). This Bence Nanay Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Bence Nanay Ph.D.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠44%Bence Nanay Ph.D. (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,024
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos