Author summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Pope results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 2,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (1,949 of 5,621 authors). This Ben Pope is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Ben Pope
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠66%Ben Pope (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,111
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ben Pope attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ben Pope vs sitewide
Ben Pope attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos