Author summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Dickieson results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 581 hits . Analysis detected 2,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,709 of 9,471 authors). This Andrew Dickieson is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Andrew Dickieson
Author details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.0% 13.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst