ABC News98%

New study finds many Americans are getting their health and wellness information from influencers. 96%

5/8/2026, 12:35:41 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 58% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 367 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.2% and a BS Rank of 96% (791 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the video peer group.

A new study finds many Americans get their health and wellness information from social media influencers. 
Let's break down the data in tonight's by the numbers. 
40% of US adults surveyed by the Pew Research Center say that they get their health and wellness news from influencers. 
54% say the influencers help them better understand how to be healthy. 
When researchers looked at influencer profiles, 86% of them were predominantly on Instagram, followed by Tik Tok and then YouTube. 
41% of influencers described themselves as some sort of health care professional with just under half saying they were conventional medical providers like doctors or dentists. 
31% of influencers called themselves coaches. 
In one of the surveys conducted as part of the study, 10% of followers said that they trust all or most of the information from influencers. 
65% say they trust some of it. 
And lastly, this is interesting finding. 
14% said a major reason they followed these influencers was to learn about things they did not want to ask their doctor about. 
Let's bring in ABC News medical contributor Dr. Aloque Patel. 
Great to see you Dr. Patel. 
Let's start with that small percentage admitting that they turn to influencers rather than talking to their doctor about something. 
What's their reaction to that? 
You Lindsay, off the bat, I'm not surprised by that reaction because people are able to go and get instantaneous information in a world where not everyone has access to healthcare professionals. 
It also means that we need to do a better job of reaching our patients where they are and building trust and being out in the community and being available digitally whether through your own personal brand or through an institution and making sure that consumers really understand how to get good highquality evidence-based information. 
Because let's be real, Lindsay, anybody can go online and claim to be a health or wellness influencer and pedal misinformation. 
And I like that statistic that only 10% of people are really trusting what they see online 
because a lot of people know that some of that information is not verified. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
10.1%
Availability Heuristic
33.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.4%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
15.3%
Framing Effect
16.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
15%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
15%
Pessimism Bias
8.7%
Negativity Bias
34.9%
Self-Serving Bias
4.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.4%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
3.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
6.3%
Primacy Effect
5.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
34.3%
False Dilemma
5.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
58%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
7.1%
Appeal to Emotion
13.6%
Begging the Question
1.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
15.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
15%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

367 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.