Fox News⁠97%

'CALM DOWN!': Gutfeld ROASTS 'desperate' Cory Booker #shorts #us #news #foxnews #gutfeld ⁠99%

4/23/2026, 12:01:05 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 68.6% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 923 faulty-reasoning hits from 207 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 98.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (283 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the video peer group.

In all his glory, we have an unhinged 
Cory at a recent Democrat fundraiser. 
Aren't they all? Cory Booker predictably went after Trump in a desperate attempt to stay relevant. 
Spoiler alert, it's not working. 
And when your party lacks a message, leadership, and common sense, the only thing left to do is yell. 
Right, Cory? 
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THERE IS A STORM IN OUR NATION. 
THERE IS DARKNESS AND WIND. 
PEOPLE ARE GETTING HURT. 
WHAT WE NEED IS NOT FROM ON HIGH. WE NEED FOOT SOLDIERS OF OUR DEMOCRACY WHO IN TIMES OF TRIAL ARE WILLING TO STAND UP. 
WILL YOU STAND FOR OUR DEMOCRACY? 
WILL YOU STAND TO GET OUT THE VOTE? 
WILL YOU STAND FOR OUR CHILDREN? 
UP FOR OUR ELDERS? 
AND WILL YOU STAND TOGETHER? UNIFIED, STRONG, BE THE HOPE THAT PEOPLE NEED. 
WE ARE DEMOCRATS. 
IT'S TIME FOR A NEW DEAL. 
IT'S TIME TO REDEEM THE DREAM OF AMERICA. 
CALM DOWN. 
WOW. A storm in our nation, a darkness and wind. 
Sounds like a gay weatherman. 
>> [laughter] 
>> Or just a weatherman. 
But here's a forecast for you, Cory. 
You're never going to be president, so lighten up, okay? 
Confirmation Bias
19.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
2.9%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
4.8%
Framing Effect
38.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
2.9%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
10.1%
Pessimism Bias
7.2%
Negativity Bias
53.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
3.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
1%
In-Group Bias
9.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
19.3%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
10.6%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
25.6%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
3.4%
False Dilemma
29%
Slippery Slope
4.8%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
16.9%
Red Herring
2.4%
Bandwagon
14%
Appeal to Emotion
68.6%
Begging the Question
17.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
8.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
6.3%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
2.4%
Unattributed Quote
5.8%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
7.2%
Indoctrination
39.1%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

207 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.