NTD100%

Fauci's COVID Mistakes Cost Many Lives! 99%

7/29/2026, 6:00:16 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 90.3% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 98.4% and a BS Rank of 99% (333 of 25,564 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the video peer group.

I watched the whole thing today, but more importantly, I was a part of the whole Fauci I inherited Fauci. 
He was here from the 1980s, so I had him for a period of time. 
And I did I disagreed with him on a lot. 
I would have had it closed down the whole country if I listened to him. 
I wait I went the Federalist way, which is basically let the governors decide and generally speaking, the Republican governors did very well. 
The Democrat governors did not very well. 
But Fauci wanted to have nobody wearing masks, if you remember, and then everybody had to wear five masks, as many masks as you could get. 
I mean, made a lot of mistakes and uh he wasn't a big factor for me. 
He was a very big factor for Biden. 
And if you remember, even though we were uh sort of uh prime time in terms of that whole disaster of COVID, uh far people died fewer in the Trump administration than in the Biden administration. 
We ran we ran it well. 
Operation Warp Speed was talked about as being one of the great success stories anywhere in the world, actually. 
And we did a good job, but many more people died under Biden than died in the Trump administration from COVID. 
COVID was a disaster, but Fauci did not help. 
Confirmation Bias
65.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
11%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
28.3%
Overconfidence Bias
13.1%
Framing Effect
11%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
2.5%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
44.3%
Self-Serving Bias
43.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
7.2%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
9.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
6.3%
Halo Effect
17.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
6.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
11%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
6.3%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
54.4%
Red Herring
14.8%
Bandwagon
8%
Appeal to Emotion
26.2%
Begging the Question
2.5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
33.8%
Tu Quoque
4.2%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
9.7%
Anecdotal
6.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
8.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
90.3%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
67.9%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

237 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.