NTD100%

Trump Promotes White House UFC Event 97%

5/20/2026, 7:15:36 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 88.3% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 694 faulty-reasoning hits from 128 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 94.8% and a BS Rank of 97% (602 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the video peer group.

UFC, that's going to be something UFC event on the South Lawn right there. 
We're going to build an arena. 
It's going to hold probably, I would say, 4,000 5,000. 
The great Dana White is putting it on. 
You know, we'll get it up to the max. 
And behind you in the park, the beautiful park, beautiful open piece of land, we're going to have anywhere from 75,000 to 100,000 people, all free of charge. 
We're building eight giant screens back there. 
So, we have a small arena here that we're building, never happened before. 
And in the back, we're going to have close to 100,000 people watching the fight. 
They're going to be all championship fights. 
It's going to be great. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
7.8%
Availability Heuristic
33.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
78.9%
Framing Effect
51.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
68.8%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
10.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
6.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
11.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
6.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
13.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
33.6%
Appeal to Emotion
65.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
88.3%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
4.7%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
60.9%

128 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.