NTD100%

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Testifies in Musk Lawsuit 94%

5/13/2026, 4:58:00 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 811 faulty-reasoning hits from 272 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 91.2% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,003 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the video peer group.

Next we move on to some technology news in Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI today CEO Sam Altman who's being sued by 
Musk providing his testimony in court and today is David Lam reports. 
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's testimony has been highly anticipated. 
He's taking the stand and is one of the key defendants sued by Elon Musk. 
Sam Altman 41 is the CEO of OpenAI and co-founded the company in 2015. 
This is week three of the Musk V Altman trial at the federal courthouse in Oakland, California. 
Altman defending himself on Tuesday saying he can't wrap his head around the accusation that he's stealing a charity. 
Altman testified that $10 billion in funding was not enough believing that donations alone couldn't fund the company and that its revenues couldn't cover its costs including computing expenses. 
Now Musk initiated the lawsuit back in 2024 alleging that OpenAI's executives and Microsoft CEO violated OpenAI's non-profit mission and sought unjust enrichment. 
Altman said the company invests everything into research and technology and hasn't paid any profits to investors yet. 
During cross-examination when Altman was asked about the testimonies of former executives who accused him of dishonesty. 
Altman said he didn't know enough about the testimonies due to his busy day job. 
Altman was repeatedly questioned about the time he was fired by the OpenAI board but then rehired. 
He said it was like running into a burning building because he still wanted to continue building OpenAI. 
The judge expects one more day of testimony with closing arguments on Thursday. 
In California, David Lam NTD News. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
11%
Availability Heuristic
11.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
10.7%
Framing Effect
35.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
6.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
34.6%
Self-Serving Bias
12.1%
Fundamental Attribution Error
16.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
5.5%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
5.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.2%
Primacy Effect
12.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
29%
False Dilemma
10.7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
14.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
19.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
39.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
3.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
12.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
5.5%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

272 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.