Fox News97%

Trump looks back on his discussions with FIFA over USMNT red card 97%

7/18/2026, 12:00:29 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 50.7% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 825 faulty-reasoning hits from 215 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 94.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (696 of 17,639 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the video peer group.

But we're gathered tonight in New York City as we await the final faceoff on Sunday between these two amazing teams. 
And it's going to be something, I think, really special. 
This has been a tournament like no other, filled with fierce competition, unforgettable moments, yet unforgettable moments. 
Like probably the most unforgettable is when they gave that gentleman, is it a red card? 
And I was forced to call Johnny and just make a recommendation. 
And I said, "Johnny, I'd like to make a recommendation. 
Let the guy in the game." 
No, I didn't say that. 
I said, "I'd like to wage a complaint." 
And actually, I didn't I had no idea what was going to happen, but you know, it's so much better the way it worked out because there's no controversy. 
They won the game and our team had all of its players. 
You made another great decision if you think about it. 
I know you'll never get credit. 
You'll never get credit for. 
Think of it if he didn't allow [clears throat] him. 
And they should say, "We would have won the game if we had our best players." 
So Johnny made yet another of his many good decisions, 
Confirmation Bias
10.2%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
15.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
25.6%
Overconfidence Bias
14.9%
Framing Effect
23.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
27.9%
Pessimism Bias
2.3%
Negativity Bias
10.2%
Self-Serving Bias
40.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
7.4%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
10.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
9.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
18.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
42.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
20.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
26%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
5.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
2.3%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
7.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.4%
Biased Writer Voice
50.7%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
5.6%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

215 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.