Fox News99%

Dr. Fauci's private diary reveals SHOCK OBSESSION #foxnews #news #health #covid1991%

7/27/2026, 4:15:12 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 525 faulty-reasoning hits from 173 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.8% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,410 of 25,433 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the video peer group.

Dr. Fauci's private diary reveals SHOCK OBSESSION #foxnews #news #health #covid19 
Senator Ran Paul has released Anthony 
Fouch's diary entries and they appear to 
show a man more focused on his own 
stardom than tackling the global 
pandemic that was killing people. One 
entry from May 2020 reads this way. Big 
front page article about me appeared in 
the Washington Post. Very flattering. 
The situation with my national and 
international fame is explosive and 
really unimaginable. It is not 
hyperbolic to say that today I am the 
most famous and talked about person in 
the country and one of the most 
recognizable persons in the world. 
Countless profiles on me. I cannot even 
read all the things that were written 
about me since I am so busy. Literally, 
all of that's a quote. 
By that point, nearly 100,000 Americans 
had already died from CO. 
Now, look here. These are just a few 
clippings taken from doctor from the 
doctor's diary. donuts with his face on 
them, his own bobblehead, the Fouchy 
Pouchis, and a collage of first 
responders wearing shirts with his name 
on 
Confirmation Bias
10.3%
Anchoring Bias
12.5%
Availability Heuristic
16.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
2.7%
Framing Effect
11.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.7%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
28.3%
Self-Serving Bias
7.1%
Fundamental Attribution Error
4.3%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
7.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
8.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
7.1%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.4%
False Dilemma
2.7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
14.7%
Red Herring
9.2%
Bandwagon
4.3%
Appeal to Emotion
29.3%
Begging the Question
13.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
7.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
10.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.3%
Anecdotal
25%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
13%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
2.7%
Special Pleading
4.3%
Genetic Fallacy
3.8%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

184 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.