NBC News99%

Trump hosts Indiana University football team at the White House 97%

5/11/2026, 11:58:22 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 662 faulty-reasoning hits from 248 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 95.2% and a BS Rank of 97% (575 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the video peer group.

Kurt Sign Denny has turned out to be I believe I think he's the coach of the last decade 
because he took a team. 
Nobody knew him. 
Nobody knew the team and he ended up taking this team all the way. 
People were betting against you all the way. 
Okay, this season was also historic because starting quarterback Fernando Mendoza. 
Now, the reason he's not here, he was so nice he called cuz he has actually JD is a big fan of ours. 
You wouldn't believe it cuz he didn't show up. 
I'm not happy. 
But that's okay. 
The reason he didn't because he's at spring training, right? 
But he became Indiana's first. 
Otherwise, if I didn't do that, I I believe me, I wouldn't have even talked about him. 
I would have not if if for he was not here for other reasons like he didn't like Trump or he didn't want to come. 
I wouldn't even mention him. 
I'd go through the hole and talk about how great I wouldn't even mention the quarterback's name. 
But he's a great guy actually and he is actually a big fan of what we're doing for our country. 
But he became Indiana's first ever Heisman Trophy winner. 
Right, coach? 
16 and0. 
That's the best record in college football since 1894. 
That's 132 years. 
That's before the NCAA. 
So, safe to say that's the greatest record in college football history. 
Confirmation Bias
3.6%
Anchoring Bias
1.2%
Availability Heuristic
3.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
23%
Framing Effect
4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
6.9%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
2.4%
Self-Serving Bias
36.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
10.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
8.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
21.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
19.4%
Straw Man
10.1%
Appeal to Authority
4.8%
False Dilemma
6.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
8.5%
Red Herring
6.9%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
23.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
5.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
3.6%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
9.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
14.1%
Indoctrination
4.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
22.2%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

248 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.