CBS News97%

Kamala Harris speaks at Democratic event: "I might" run in 2028 93%

4/10/2026, 10:26:31 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 2,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 620 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 89.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,194 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the video peer group.

Democrats who are well, thinking about running for president in 2028 at least seeking the party's nomination speaking at Al Sharpton's conference. 
That's National Action Network conference in New York this week. 
Former Vice President Kamala Harris, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg spoke today. 
And they came kind of close to letting people know what they might do in 2028 or the year before which is the important year. 
Listen. 
Are you going to run again in 28? 
Listen, I might. 
I might. 
I'm thinking about it. 
I'm thinking about it. 
The one thing I'm really clear about also is the status quo is not working. 
And hasn't been working for a lot of people for a long time. 
>> Of course, we want to see an end to the current regime, but it what we really need to make clear is what we would be doing instead that it doesn't have to be this way and your everyday life could be better. 
Just so my calendar's clear, should I be reserving a table at Sylvia's? 
Are you Are you going to run again? 
You save me a seat. 
I'll be there. 
CBS News political director Fin Gomez has the latest from New York. 
So when the Vice President says I might, that sounds like a pretty close to a yes. 
But when she also says Fin that the status quo hasn't been working for some time. 
Well, for 4 years she was part of the status quo. 
She absolutely was and look, we all week we've been talking to people who the attendees here they've been saying they've they've been eager to listen to some of these this parade of 2028 presidential contenders that have come to this event organized by the Reverend Al Sharpton. 
But the one that the most attendees were looking forward to Major has been Vice President Harris. 
And look, there are some who felt that she didn't get a a square deal back in 2024 that she like she was hampered by President Biden and the party at the time. 
But what you're what you're sounding what what what I heard today were inklings like sort of a wink wink and a nod if you will that she's seriously considering a run. 
And the other thing I wanted to point out is that she was also furnishing a foreign policy credentials really comparing herself to the current leadership in the White House I thought which I thought was significant. 
But really that moment with Sharpton on the stage that was the that was really the clearest indicator yet that she's seriously considering a run and that she might Major. 
The other reaction I got from some of her supporters Major after her speech was yes, they encouraged her to run. 
She got a standing ovation after her after her comments. 
But there were some who also kind of like wanted a wait and see had a wait and see approach. 
While they supported her, they liked her, but they were but they were open to speaking and wanted to hear from other potential 2028 contenders which I thought was interesting. 
I also spoke just before your show Major to a former senior Harris campaign official. 
When I asked that person about another run they told me while they're grateful to the former Vice President, they also believe that their party is not made up of people who like to look backwards at the rearview mirror. 
Very striking comment there and also representing what some people in the Democratic Party do believe Major. 
Fin Gomez from New York. 
Appreciate it. 
Thank you very much. 
Confirmation Bias
14.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
12.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
2.7%
Hindsight Bias
1.8%
Overconfidence Bias
1.3%
Framing Effect
1.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
3.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
23.2%
Pessimism Bias
2.1%
Negativity Bias
4.7%
Self-Serving Bias
8.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
5.3%
Actor-Observer Bias
5.3%
In-Group Bias
19.4%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
7.1%
Halo Effect
10.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5.5%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
3.2%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
10.3%
False Dilemma
7.1%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
19.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
11.1%
Appeal to Emotion
17.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
4.2%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
6.5%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
19.5%
No True Scotsman
11.3%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
9.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
1.8%
Biased Writer Voice
28.5%
Indoctrination
6.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
31.9%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
1.8%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

620 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.