NTD⁠100%

Citizens React To Communist Influence In 'No Kings' Rally ⁠95%

3/31/2026, 2:45:19 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 544 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (924 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the video peer group.

AnotherĀ roundĀ ofĀ noĀ kingsĀ ralliesĀ takingĀ placeĀ acrossĀ theĀ countryĀ thisĀ pastĀ weekend.Ā 
SomeĀ ofĀ theĀ keyĀ attendeesĀ reportedlyĀ includeĀ communistĀ andĀ socialistĀ groupsĀ fundedĀ byĀ NevilleĀ RoyĀ Singham,Ā anĀ AmericanĀ techĀ millionaireĀ withĀ knownĀ tiesĀ toĀ China.Ā 
Meanwhile,Ā someĀ protestersĀ wereĀ carryingĀ flagsĀ emlazenedĀ withĀ theĀ hammerĀ andĀ sickleĀ symbol.Ā 
HowĀ concernedĀ shouldĀ AmericansĀ beĀ aboutĀ communistĀ influenceĀ inĀ ourĀ society?Ā 
EntityĀ SamĀ WongĀ wasĀ outĀ onĀ theĀ NationalĀ MallĀ inĀ DCĀ toĀ hearĀ fromĀ theĀ people.Ā 
What'sĀ yourĀ reactionĀ toĀ allĀ theseĀ noĀ kingsĀ protestsĀ happeningĀ acrossĀ theĀ countryĀ overĀ theĀ weekend?Ā 
>>Ā PureĀ silliness.Ā 
JustĀ whatĀ aĀ joke.Ā 
WhatĀ aĀ joke.Ā 
TheĀ guy'sĀ finallyĀ doingĀ theĀ jobĀ thatĀ hasĀ toĀ beĀ doneĀ andĀ steppingĀ inĀ andĀ uhĀ somebody'sĀ gotĀ toĀ takeĀ someĀ leadershipĀ andĀ ifĀ itĀ looksĀ likeĀ kingshipĀ toĀ uhĀ theĀ liberalsĀ thenĀ uhĀ soĀ beĀ it.Ā 
>>Ā IĀ thinkĀ it'sĀ challengingĀ becauseĀ heĀ uhĀ youĀ knowĀ he'sĀ gotĀ anĀ agendaĀ andĀ aĀ lotĀ ofĀ peopleĀ disagreeĀ withĀ it.Ā 
It'sĀ difficultĀ whenĀ youĀ gotĀ soĀ manyĀ divisionsĀ acrossĀ eitherĀ party.Ā 
SoĀ >>Ā whyĀ areĀ youĀ protestingĀ somethingĀ thatĀ doesn'tĀ exist?Ā 
IĀ meanĀ thereĀ isĀ noĀ kingsĀ andĀ youĀ knowĀ TrumpĀ wouldĀ beĀ theĀ firstĀ oneĀ toĀ sayĀ thatĀ youĀ knowĀ heĀ wasĀ electedĀ byĀ theĀ peopleĀ toĀ doĀ theĀ job.Ā 
He'sĀ doingĀ aĀ greatĀ job.Ā 
YouĀ knowĀ IĀ don'tĀ understandĀ theĀ relevanceĀ ofĀ aĀ noĀ kingsĀ protest.Ā 
>>Ā It'sĀ anotherĀ reasonĀ forĀ peopleĀ whoĀ don'tĀ haveĀ aĀ jobĀ toĀ comeĀ outĀ andĀ getĀ togetherĀ andĀ youĀ knowĀ toĀ justĀ tellĀ eachĀ otherĀ howĀ greatĀ theyĀ areĀ andĀ that'sĀ allĀ itĀ is.Ā 
It'sĀ it'sĀ propagandaĀ andĀ IĀ don'tĀ payĀ muchĀ attentionĀ toĀ it.Ā 
>>Ā IĀ don'tĀ thinkĀ theyĀ shouldĀ beĀ runningĀ myĀ tripĀ toĀ WashingtonĀ DCĀ orĀ anywhere.Ā [laughter]Ā IĀ mean,Ā youĀ wantĀ toĀ bringĀ touristsĀ intoĀ cities.Ā 
IĀ don'tĀ wantĀ toĀ seeĀ that.Ā 
>>Ā OverĀ theĀ weekend,Ā weĀ sawĀ aĀ lotĀ ofĀ peopleĀ paradingĀ withĀ aĀ communistĀ flag.Ā 
AndĀ thenĀ we'reĀ alsoĀ seeingĀ someĀ really,Ā youĀ know,Ā organizationsĀ thatĀ haveĀ tiesĀ toĀ theĀ ChineseĀ CommunistĀ PartyĀ thatĀ are,Ā youĀ know,Ā backingĀ thisĀ wholeĀ movement.Ā 
WhatĀ doĀ youĀ makeĀ ofĀ that?Ā 
HowĀ concernedĀ doĀ youĀ thinkĀ weĀ shouldĀ beĀ aboutĀ that?Ā 
>>Ā IĀ thinkĀ weĀ shouldĀ beĀ concerned.Ā 
IĀ thinkĀ thatĀ uh,Ā youĀ know,Ā AmericaĀ first.Ā 
That'sĀ whyĀ everyone'sĀ comingĀ hereĀ isĀ forĀ theĀ theĀ freedomĀ andĀ theĀ valuesĀ andĀ theĀ benefitsĀ ofĀ beingĀ anĀ American.Ā yetĀ they'reĀ goingĀ toĀ polluteĀ thatĀ withĀ theĀ ideologiesĀ thatĀ they'reĀ bringingĀ withĀ them.Ā 
>>Ā IĀ thinkĀ there'sĀ allĀ sortsĀ ofĀ umĀ youĀ knowĀ ideologiesĀ allĀ aroundĀ theĀ worldĀ lookingĀ toĀ competeĀ withĀ capitalismĀ andĀ theĀ WestĀ andĀ weĀ doĀ ourĀ bestĀ toĀ youĀ knowĀ standĀ upĀ forĀ whatĀ weĀ believe.Ā 
>>Ā UhĀ followĀ theĀ money.Ā 
It'sĀ probablyĀ GeorgeĀ SorosĀ somewhereĀ hasĀ gotĀ hisĀ handĀ inĀ it.Ā 
IfĀ you'reĀ AmericanĀ andĀ thisĀ isĀ yourĀ homeĀ orĀ you'reĀ makingĀ moneyĀ fromĀ thisĀ country,Ā thenĀ yourĀ allegianceĀ shouldĀ beĀ here.Ā 
>>Ā Well,Ā I'mĀ notĀ surprisedĀ byĀ anythingĀ anymore.Ā 
YouĀ know,Ā lookĀ atĀ NewĀ York.Ā 
We'veĀ gotĀ aĀ communistĀ inĀ there.Ā 
We'veĀ gotĀ toĀ haveĀ ourĀ ownĀ country,Ā ourĀ ownĀ rules,Ā ourĀ ownĀ laws.Ā 
AndĀ uhĀ weĀ shouldn'tĀ beĀ influencedĀ byĀ byĀ foreignĀ governmentsĀ andĀ andĀ foreignĀ players.Ā 
Confirmation Bias
25.2%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
23.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
2.4%
Hindsight Bias
1.1%
Overconfidence Bias
14%
Framing Effect
4.8%
Loss Aversion
6.1%
Status Quo Bias
7.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0.9%
Pessimism Bias
2.6%
Negativity Bias
35.7%
Self-Serving Bias
2.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
12.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
6.3%
Halo Effect
10.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
7.4%
Primacy Effect
2.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
2.2%
Ad Hominem
6.8%
Straw Man
6.8%
Appeal to Authority
10.1%
False Dilemma
4.6%
Slippery Slope
6.8%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
36%
Red Herring
4.8%
Bandwagon
6.3%
Appeal to Emotion
22.6%
Begging the Question
6.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
1.1%
Tu Quoque
4.6%
Burden of Proof
5.3%
Appeal to Nature
0.9%
Composition/Division
5%
Anecdotal
8.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
7.7%
Special Pleading
2.6%
Genetic Fallacy
3.9%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

544 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.