BS Summary: This video contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Anecdotal, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 2,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 821 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (10,177 of 18,784 videos). This video is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the video peer group.
There has never been anything like it.
Probably in terms of an event, let alone soccer or football, whatever you want to call it, but I thought it was incredible.
It was four times greater than any FIFA ever held.
And it's probably about five times actually,
they're telling me today.
So, we're very proud of our country.
We're very proud of the job that was done by everybody.
We congratulate Johnny Infantino and all of his staff and the incredible job they did.
But this was one of the greatest events of any kind ever held.
So we're really happy that it it did so well.
And all over the world, people have uh come and they've loved our country.
You know, shown off our country in a different light.
And uh it was a great thing.
It was a great event and I'm glad you all enjoyed it.
>> Argentina lost.
>> Say it.
>> Argentina lost.
>> No, I wasn't sad.
I think they both played well.
Uh, I would say Spain played better really, but they both played well.
I mean, they got to the finals and it was very exciting actually.
It looked like Spain dominated, but it was a very close match.
So, it was it was great. It was a great event. Yes.
>> Well, we feel very badly. But, you know, those great people, those great patriots
were out there fighting that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
Uh Iran has been very very badly damaged.
They've uh lost everything almost militarily. They've got very little left.
They've got some missiles. They've got some drones.
They've got some manufacturing ability.
Not much. Uh we controlled the straight.
They don't control anything. So we'll see what happens.
But we hit them very hard again tonight.
And uh we did that in honor of the probably three.
It's probably three as opposed to two.
great
patriots.
>> What are the consequences for China?
>> Well, we're going to see.
We'll be speaking to them.
We'll be
>> sir, can I ask you, did you have a conversation with Canada?
>> I did.
Yeah, I did.
>> How did How did that go?
>> Well, it went good, but I I told him, I mean, you got to stop these fires from coming in and, you know, poisoning our air.
Our air has been poisoned.
I have a good relationship with Mark Carney, but
you know, we got to stop the fires up
there.
If we can help them, we'll help them.
But maybe they should pay us some damages or something or we should do some tariffs.
But it was terrible. I mean, you had businesses closing.
In particular, Michigan, if you look at Detroit, the Detroit, Michigan area, they had to close everything.
They had closed car plants and a lot of other things.
So, I've never remembered this happening.
Over the last four or five years, you saw it starting to take place.
I've never remembered it happening.
>> Did you have a chance to talk to the prime minister of Spain as well?
>> I did.
I spoke to Spain and I congratulated them on having a great team.
I spoke to I really spoke to a lot of people.
>> No, I have no tension. I have no tension with anybody.
have anti
>> well it has it has a lot and uh you know
it has a lot of capability but as I understand it in about a month or so
they're going to send it to have it be maxed out so they're going to be sending it and they'll have it be maxed out
it'll take about a month
>> wildfire did you speak to the Canadian prime minister
>> I did
well I was just saying I gave an answer here I spoke to him about it I said you got to you got to get it
stopped
It's really forest management and they should know how to do that.
If you go back four or five years, I don't remember ever having a problem like this.
And we do have that problem.
>> Mr. President, you said at the start of the war, it would be four or five weeks.
>> Well, you keep this a far bigger job
that we're doing. We were doing a little
job stopping them from having a certain capability.
Now, we're just ending it.
So, it's really not the same thing.
What we're doing now is we're ending any chance where they could have a nuclear missile.
If you look at it, after a week and a half, not four weeks, a week and a half, two weeks, we stopped them from
from
probably, but I don't want to have the
word probably. Thank you very much.
>> Thank you, sir.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.