ABC News99%

President Trump draws laughs at White House Correspondents' Dinner 100%

7/25/2026, 3:08:37 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 492 faulty-reasoning hits from 161 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (112 of 21,886 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the video peer group.

Just like my presidency, the second time is always better. 
It's always better. 
And the third time will be better yet. 
>> [cheering] 
>> I'm only kidding. 
I hope that everyone finally got to enjoy their entire very delicious beef tenderloins. 
Very special beef. 
And I want you all to know that Bobby Kennedy was right here personally ran over the cow in his car. 
>> [applause] 
>> And he cut it up and he brought it here for you to eat tonight. 
So, it's very fresh. 
But always, I do have one question about what happened that time because he was there. 
How the hell did you not see that coming? 
He sees everything. 
>> [cheering] 
>> He sees every He's telling me about your grandmother and your this. 
Why the hell didn't we got to ask him that question when he gets up here? 
Why didn't he see that coming? 
Confirmation Bias
9.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
18.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
19.3%
Overconfidence Bias
14.9%
Framing Effect
8.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
13%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
8.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
32.3%
Actor-Observer Bias
9.9%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
21.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
1.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.1%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
18.6%
Red Herring
12.4%
Bandwagon
3.7%
Appeal to Emotion
36%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
9.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
9.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
31.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
8.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
3.7%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
5.6%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

161 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.