Crowds gather as crews prepare to remove Trump's name from Kennedy Center 96%

6/12/2026, 5:45:31 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 68.9% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 991 faulty-reasoning hits from 193 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,061 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the video peer group.

Of course they're going to fight us every bit of the way. 
There's going to be a a legal fight. 
So, it means a lot to have you and others coming out and standing here and writing letters and not letting them take us for granted because this is bigger than this center. 
This is about all of us. 
This is only the beginning, but I think this is a good start. 
>> Yes. 
>> That they understand they have removed from the website and from some of their social media. 
So, today is a good day to see the scaffolding going up. 
We'll just have to wait. 
>> I will be extremely excited and happy because I don't like having his name on this building. 
It is illegal to have it on there and he is not a arts supporter. 
>> I mean I think it needs to come down and I think a lot of DC residents would be happy with it coming back to its original name and I think there's no need to change what great name. 
Confirmation Bias
15%
Anchoring Bias
6.2%
Availability Heuristic
31.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
9.3%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
13.5%
Framing Effect
26.4%
Loss Aversion
17.1%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
37.8%
Pessimism Bias
13%
Negativity Bias
8.8%
Self-Serving Bias
23.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
18.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
2.6%
In-Group Bias
20.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
6.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
9.3%
False Dilemma
15.5%
Slippery Slope
17.1%
Circular Reasoning
20.7%
Hasty Generalization
30.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
28%
Appeal to Emotion
68.9%
Begging the Question
4.1%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
15%
Tu Quoque
2.6%
Burden of Proof
24.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.1%
Anecdotal
6.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
18.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

193 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.