NBC News99%

Trump: 'The people that make the biggest impact, they're the ones that they go after' 95%

4/26/2026, 4:03:03 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 67.6% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 813 faulty-reasoning hits from 188 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 91.4% and a BS Rank of 95% (975 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.20% of the video peer group.

I've studied assassinations 
and I must tell you the most impactful 
people, the people that do the most, you 
take a look at the people, Abraham 
Lincoln, I mean, you go through the people that have gone through this where they got them. 
But the people that do the most, the people that make the biggest impact, they're the ones that they go after. 
They don't go after the ones that don't do much cuz they like it that way. 
And when you look at the people that have either whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, they're very impactful people. 
Just take a look at people. 
the names. They're the big names. 
And uh 
I hate to say I'm honored by that, but 
I've done a lot. We've done a lot. 
We have we've taken this country and we 
were a laughingstock for years and now 
we're the hottest country anywhere in the world. We've changed this country 
and there are a lot of people that are not happy about 
Confirmation Bias
16.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
14.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
15.4%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
53.2%
Framing Effect
32.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
6.4%
Pessimism Bias
8.5%
Negativity Bias
14.9%
Self-Serving Bias
19.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
8.5%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
4.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
14.4%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.2%
Primacy Effect
11.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
12.8%
False Dilemma
16.5%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
3.2%
Hasty Generalization
46.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
6.4%
Appeal to Emotion
15.4%
Begging the Question
12.8%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
10.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
6.4%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
11.2%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
67.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

188 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.