NTD⁠^100%

New Reactors Online, America's Nuclear Power Renaissance! ^⁠99%

7/25/2026, 12:30:17 AM

Topics: Video

BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 228 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 99.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (268 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the video peer group.

Confidence50%

underlinesheatmap

228 words

Last year I signed four historic executive orders to reignite a wave of progress in America's nuclear power

production and promote this abundant, affordable, unlimited supply of energy for the American people.

As part of this effort, I directed Secretary of Energy Chris Wright to establish a pilot program for advanced reactors and see at least three cutting-edge reactors started up safely by the 4th of July.

And what we've done has been pretty much of a miracle.

Most believe the goal was impossible, but I'm delighted to say that four companies succeeded in meeting that deadline.

Four of the greatest in the world at this subject.

So, these are the first new privately-funded advanced reactors to turn on the United States in over four decades.

And making sure that these groundbreaking designs were safe

to build and test so quickly was a challenge that required a historic partnership between these innovative companies and our administration.

In the past, it often took 6 years or more to approve a reactor design if they were ever approved at all.

But now America's building again, America's dreaming again, and we're leading the world in pioneering the next generation of nuclear power.

And there's nobody even close.

We've taken a lead over the last 2 years that has been I hope insurmountable.

We'll see.

Confirmation Bias

8.3%

Anchoring Bias

8.3%

Availability Heuristic

9.6%

Representativeness Heuristic

4.4%

Hindsight Bias

Overconfidence Bias

27.6%

Framing Effect

29.4%

Loss Aversion

Status Quo Bias

9.2%

Sunk Cost Effect

Optimism Bias

35.1%

Pessimism Bias

0.9%

Negativity Bias

14.5%

Self-Serving Bias

47.4%

Fundamental Attribution Error

19.3%

Actor-Observer Bias

In-Group Bias

Out-Group Homogeneity Bias

Halo Effect

15.8%

Horn Effect

Dunning-Kruger Effect

Recency Bias

6.6%

Primacy Effect

17.1%

Blind-Spot Bias

Ad Hominem

Straw Man

Appeal to Authority

28.9%

False Dilemma

2.2%

Slippery Slope

Circular Reasoning

Hasty Generalization

35.5%

Red Herring

Bandwagon

20.6%

Appeal to Emotion

28.9%

Begging the Question

14.5%

Post Hoc (False Cause)

32.5%

Tu Quoque

Burden of Proof

10.5%

Appeal to Nature

Composition/Division

Anecdotal

4.8%

No True Scotsman

Ambiguity (Equivocation)

39.9%

Gambler’s Fallacy

Middle Ground

Personal Incredulity

Special Pleading

Genetic Fallacy

Unattributed Quote

Quote-first Misdirection

Biased Writer Voice

Indoctrination

Politically Left Leaning Bias

Politically Right Leaning Bias

Attempt to Sell a Product or Service

228 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.

New Reactors Online, America's Nuclear Power Renaissance! ^⁠99%

Analysis

Biases

Fallacies

New Reactors Online, America's Nuclear Power Renaissance! ⁠99%

Analysis

Biases

Fallacies

New Reactors Online, America's Nuclear Power Renaissance! ^⁠99%