Steven Spielberg says he's believed in alien life since 'Close Encounters' 97%

6/7/2026, 4:10:00 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Personal Incredulity, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 69.5% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 554 faulty-reasoning hits from 128 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 94.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (797 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the video peer group.

Look, I've been a believer since I made Close Encounters 50 years ago. 
Um but I and I wouldn't call that science fiction. 
I called it science speculation. 
When I did press on Close Encounters, they refused to call it science fiction. 
But I I I I I was certainly a believer of life elsewhere, but I was I would always say until I see a UAP or a UFO with my own eyes, I'm not going to categorically state that there's proof that there's life life from out there has come here. 
But I that I have changed that because I'm now willing to to change my mind because of the circumstantial evidence, which is overwhelming. 
Confirmation Bias
29.7%
Anchoring Bias
10.2%
Availability Heuristic
48.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
18.8%
Framing Effect
16.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
10.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
18.8%
Optimism Bias
39.8%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
3.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
10.9%
In-Group Bias
10.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
10.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
19.5%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
18.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
18.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
69.5%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
18.8%
No True Scotsman
7.8%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
11.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
39.8%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

128 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.