Obama and Mamdani sing Wheels on the Bus to preschoolers 32%

4/18/2026, 10:13:44 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Recency Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 170 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,534 of 16,813 videos). This video is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the video peer group.

The show. Wow. 
The wheels on the bus go round and round. 
>> [screaming] 
>> What's the next line? Uh 
My shoe came off. 
My shoe came The wheels on the bus go open 
The doors on the bus go open and The doors on the bus go open 
The doors on the bus go open 
What about The wipers on the bus go 
So we're going to read a book right now called Alone and Together. Waterfalls. 
Is that what you guys do when you go? 
Yes. 
Waterfalls. 
Who's going to help me GET UP? ME. 
OH, NO. 
I CAN'T GET YOU GOT TO PULL THIS hand very hard. 
>> [laughter] 
>> Oh, no. 
Oh. 
Oh. Wait, wait, wait. One more little 
One more little help. Come here. Come 
here. Come here. 
Oh, thank you. Thank you. Yes. 
I never would have made it without You saw me in a picture and now you're in real life. 
>> [laughter] 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
4.7%
Availability Heuristic
8.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
10%
Framing Effect
4.7%
Loss Aversion
7.6%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
4.1%
Self-Serving Bias
19.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
11.2%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
7.6%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
1.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
12.4%
Primacy Effect
1.8%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
5.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
14.7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
10.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

170 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.