CBS News97%

DHS Secretary Mullin asks states to use new database for elections #shorts 99%

7/18/2026, 1:56:09 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 856 faulty-reasoning hits from 206 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (181 of 17,634 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the video peer group.

At President Trump's direction, 
our cybersecurity team and CISA will release an updated election infrastructure plan, and it'll be public within 30 days. 
Meaning that will give the states the resources they need to help from the cyber side. 
From us, if they participate in the SAVE program, we'll provide the service the resources and training to support state election integrity. 
We're not trying to change the outcome. 
We're trying to make sure that American people can trust our voting system. 
REAL ID does not prove citizenship and does not give you the right to vote. 
You must be a US citizen, and you must be eligible to vote. 
Uh before and after the election, we will scrub all election records looking for illegal aliens and those who are ineligible to vote, including those that somehow voted, yet they were deceased. 
If you're illegal and attempted to vote, 
or you tried to vote illegally for someone else, 
we will find you, and we will charge you. 
Illegal voter registration and illegal voting 
both carry penalties up to 5 years in prison 
and up to $250,000 in fines. 
We will pursue maximum pressure on this. 
Confirmation Bias
15%
Anchoring Bias
7.8%
Availability Heuristic
15.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
15.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
39.8%
Framing Effect
21.4%
Loss Aversion
7.3%
Status Quo Bias
6.3%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
12.6%
Pessimism Bias
14.6%
Negativity Bias
30.1%
Self-Serving Bias
3.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
10.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
3.4%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
35%
False Dilemma
4.4%
Slippery Slope
3.4%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
24.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
35.9%
Begging the Question
11.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
18.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
23.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
15.5%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
36.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
3.4%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

206 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.