Astronauts give briefing on board Artemis spacecraft 96%

4/4/2026, 12:46:38 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Circular Reasoning, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 538 faulty-reasoning hits from 205 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (777 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the video peer group.

Gosh, in our first day in space, uh, we just saw some extraordinary things. 
The Earth up close and then by the time we had a bit of a nap and got up, the Earth was just so far away again. 
And then to come in for that transunter injection, we came all the way back to Earth again. 
We were out there at 60,000 kilometers. 
We came back to within 200 km of the planet and it just felt like we were falling out of the sky back to Earth and I said to Reed, I I feels like we're going to hit it. 
It's amazing that we're actually going to go around and miss this thing. 
It was just so close. 
And so to take all of that in was really phenomenal. 
So very interesting that we've taken some pictures. 
Uh we are now over the halfway point to the moon and we took some pictures earlier today and then after putting them on the computer to look closer we found a feature you know the the Grand Canyon of the moon it's called Oriental Basin and we were able to see the entire thing. 
Stand. 
Confirmation Bias
19%
Anchoring Bias
8.8%
Availability Heuristic
26.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
2.4%
Overconfidence Bias
3.9%
Framing Effect
40.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
17.1%
Pessimism Bias
6.3%
Negativity Bias
5.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
3.9%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.8%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
26.8%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0.5%
Appeal to Emotion
12.2%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
9.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
31.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
32.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
6.3%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

205 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.